What does describing Hassan as a "sacrificial lamb" signify about Amir's actions?

• A. It reveals that Hassan's role was to provoke Amir
• B. It shows Amir fled to save himself rather than defend Hassan
• C. It indicates that Amir's guilt began to manifest only later
• D. It suggests their friendship was never truly strong

Answer: (B)

This describes Amir’s moral failure under pressure and how fear shapes choices. Calling Hassan a “sacrificial lamb” highlights that Hassan bears the burden to save Amir from danger or shame, while Amir looks out for his own safety and status. In the crucial moments, Amir does not defend Hassan or take responsibility; instead, he allows Hassan to absorb the consequences or to be blamed, effectively sacrificing Hassan to protect himself and maintain Baba’s approval and their social standing. This term points to Amir’s cowardice and the cost carried by Hassan, a cost that foreshadows the enduring guilt and strain in their relationship.

The idea isn’t about Hassan provoking Amir, or that guilt only appears much later, or that their friendship was never strong. It centers on the unequal dynamic where Amir uses Hassan as a means to shield himself from danger and judgment.